Reviewer's Guideline
The review process is a critical part of the publication process. It helps editors make informed decisions and enables authors to improve their manuscripts. The journal follows a double-blind peer review system.
Before accepting a review, reviewer(s) should ensure the manuscript falls within their expertise and that they can dedicate sufficient time to conduct a thorough evaluation.
Criteria for Reviewing
Reviewer(s) should assess manuscripts based on the following:
- Format of the Article: Note any major deviations from the standard manuscript structure.
- Technical Presentation: The manuscript should be scientifically rigorous rather than narrative. Avoid accepting repetition of previous work. Check for conceptual advancement and proper referencing of prior research.
- Interpretation of Results: Discussion should be relevant to the results and avoid irrelevant or unachievable claims.
- Statistical Presentation: Ensure appropriate statistical methods are applied wherever necessary.
- Data Integrity: Report any concerns regarding duplication, manipulation, or suspicious data.
- Summary: Highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, considering its potential impact.
- Conclusion: Recommend necessary corrections for acceptance, suggest acceptance as is, or advise rejection if the manuscript is unsuitable for publication.
