Reviewer's Guideline

The review process is a critical part of the publication process. It helps editors make informed decisions and enables authors to improve their manuscripts. The journal follows a double-blind peer review system.

Before accepting a review, reviewer(s) should ensure the manuscript falls within their expertise and that they can dedicate sufficient time to conduct a thorough evaluation.

Criteria for Reviewing
Reviewer(s) should assess manuscripts based on the following:

• Format of the Article:Note any major deviations from the standard manuscript structure.
• Technical Presentation:The manuscript should be scientifically rigorous rather than narrative. Avoid accepting repetition of previous work. Check for conceptual advancement and proper referencing of prior research.
• Interpretation of Results:Discussion should be relevant to the results and avoid irrelevant or unachievable claims.
• Statistical Presentation:Ensure appropriate statistical methods are applied wherever necessary.
• Data Integrity:Report any concerns regarding duplication, manipulation, or suspicious data.
• Summary:Highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, considering its potential impact.
• Conclusion:Recommend necessary corrections for acceptance, suggest acceptance as is, or advise rejection if the manuscript is unsuitable for publication.