Gender-related differences in using computer assisted teaching strategy on student motivation in biology based in public secondary schools in Baringo county, Kenya

Authors

  • Gilbert L. Cheruiyot Department of Education, Chuka University, P. O. Box Chuka, Kenya
  • Mercy W. Njagi Department of Education, Chuka University, P. O. Box Chuka, Kenya
  • Beatrice M. Mburugu Department of Education, Chuka University, P. O. Box Chuka, Kenya

Keywords:

computer assisted teaching strategy, motivation, student

Abstract

This study sought to determine how gender inequalities in using computer-assisted pedagogics in Baringo County influenced biology students' motivation. Solomon's four-quasi-experimental design was used. Purposive sampling was used to choose eight extra-county secondary faculties in Baringo to integrate laptop power-assisted Teaching into classroom teaching and learning. The investigator used stratified sampling to select the study's sample schools. A stratified sample of 324 biology students was drawn from different County secondary schools. Easy random sampling was accustomed to deciding the experimental and management groups. The experimental groups offered computer-assisted instruction, while traditional instruction was given to the control groups. Two research tools were used the Biology Achievement Test and the Biology Motivation Questionnaire. The data were examined descriptively with frequencies and percentages and inferentially with Analysis of Variance and the t-test. According to the study's findings, the strategy has a beneficial impact on biology student motivation. The data show that students were exposed to CATS, and there was statistical significance in student motivation. CATS has been found to boost biology student motivation. The study findings will assist curriculum makers at the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development in developing guidelines and standards for integrating, developing, and using CATS in school curricula to promote learning. Student accomplishment and motivation, as a result, biology teachers should include computer-assisted education in their lectures to boost academic activity and overall biology enthusiasm.

References

Athuman AJ, Monroe CM. Elements of Effective Environmental Education programs, School of Forest Resources and Conservation University of Florida, 2004.

Brophy J. Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.

Cavas P. Factors Affecting the Motivation of Turkish Primary Students for Science Learning. Science Education International. 2011;22(1):31-42.

Elliot AJ, Covington M. Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 2013.

Glynn SM, Taasoobshirazi G, Brickman P. Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44:1088-1107.

Jenkins EW. The Student Voice in Science Education Research and Issues Journal of Baltic Science, 2005.

Kerora FN, Wachanga SW, Oraro W. Effect of Cooperative Concept Mapping Teaching Approach on Secondary School Student Motivation in Biology in Gucha District, Kenya International Journal of Science and Mathematical Education. 2006;5:111-124.

Koul R, Roy L, Lerdpornkulrat T. Motivational Goal Orientation, Perceptions of Biology and Physics Classroom Learning Environments and Gender. Learning Environments Research. 2012;15:217-229.

Nodia G. Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Academic Performance, Journal of Educational Psychology. 2010;82;525-538.

OECD. Equally, Prepared for Life? How 15-year-old boys and Girls Perform in school, 2007. Found in: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/42843625.pd

Ozbas S. High School Students’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Regulation in Learning Biology. International Journal of Education Science. 2016;15(12):261-268.

Planet Science. Student Review of the Science Curriculum, Major Findings, London: Planet science, 2003.

Prokop P, Prokop M, Tunnidifee SD. Is biology boring? Student attitude towards Biology Educ. 2007;24:161-172.

Pintrich P, Schunk D. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2002.

Shihusa H, Kerora FN. Using Advance Organizer to Enhance Student Motivation in Learning Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 2009;5(4):413-420.

Wellington J. Practical Work in Science: Time for are-appraisal. In S. Amos, & R. Bohan (Eds.), Teaching Science in Secondary Schools: A Reader (pp. 55-66). London: Routledge, 2002.

Zull JE. The Art of Changing the Brains Sterling, VA: Publishing, LLC, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-17

How to Cite

Cheruiyot, G. L., Njagi, M. W., & Mburugu, B. M. (2023). Gender-related differences in using computer assisted teaching strategy on student motivation in biology based in public secondary schools in Baringo county, Kenya. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 3(2), 15–19. Retrieved from https://www.dzarc.com/education/article/view/295

Issue

Section

Articles