The influence of digital parenting on child development with the family environment as a moderating variable at Islamic elementary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.5.37-44Keywords:
Digital parenting, Child development, Family environment, Islamic schoolsAbstract
This study addresses the influence of digital parenting on children's religious and moral, cognitive, social, and emotional development at Islamic elementary schools in Palu City, as well as the role of the family environment in moderating this influence. The study aims to analyze the direct impact of digital parenting on these four aspects of child development and to examine the moderating role of the family environment. An associative-explanatory quantitative approach was employed. The study population consisted of 1,446 parents of students from two Islamic schools. A sample of 313 parents was determined using Slovin's formula and proportional random sampling. Data collection utilized questionnaires as the primary instrument, supplemented by observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis used Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) in SmartPLS, including evaluation of the outer model, inner model, and bootstrapping, as well as testing direct and moderating effects. The results indicate that the measurement model met validity and reliability criteria, with outer loadings of 0.803–0.896, AVE values of 0.686–0.756, HTMT values below 0.85, and Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability values above 0.70. For the inner model, VIF values ranged from 1.001 to 1.002, Adjusted R² from 0.512 to 0.553, and Q² from 0.349 to 0.389, indicating moderate explanatory power and good predictive relevance. Digital parenting had a positive and significant influence on religious and moral (β=0.668; p<0.001), cognitive (β=0.613; p<0.001), social (β=0.641; p<0.001), and emotional (β=0.597; p<0.001) development. The family environment does not have a direct, significant effect on the four aspects of child development; however, its interaction with digital parenting has a positive and significant impact on religious and moral values (β=0.305), cognitive (β=0.347), social (β=0.299), and emotional (β=0.371) aspects all with p<0.001. Thus, the family environment reinforces the influence of digital parenting, establishing a pattern of pure moderation. The study's implications underscore the importance of communication, guidance, supervision, and a conducive family environment in digital parenting. Parents need to enhance their digital parenting literacy, and schools should strengthen collaboration and digital literacy with families. At the same time, the government can use these findings as a basis for developing family-based digital parenting education programs.
References
Altafim ERP, De Oliveira RC, Pluciennik GA, Marino E, Gaspardo CM. Digital parenting program: enhancing parenting and reducing child behavior problems. Children. 2024;11(8):980.
Amato PR. Dimensions of the family environment as perceived by children: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1990;52(3):613-620. doi:10.2307/352928.
Banić L, Orehovački T. A comparison of parenting strategies in a digital environment: a systematic literature review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2024;8(4):32.
Borgstede M, Scholz M. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to generalization and replication–a representationalist view. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:605191. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191.
Bornstein MH, Lansford JE. Parenting. In: Handbook of cultural developmental science. Psychology Press, 2010, 259-277.
Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory. In: Encyclopedia of psychology. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000, 129-133.
Calabretta G, Kleinsmann M. Technology-driven evolution of design practices: envisioning the role of design in the digital era. Journal of Marketing Management. 2017;33(3-4):292-304. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2017.1284436.
Choy YN, Lau EYH, Wu D. Digital parenting and its impact on early childhood development: a scoping review. Education and Information Technologies. 2024;29(16):22147-22187. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12643-w.
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2014.
Fiani C, Saeghe P, McGill M, Khamis M. Exploring the perspectives of Social VR-aware non-parent adults and parents on children's use of social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2024;8(CSCW1):54. doi:10.1145/3652867.
Krauss S, Orth U, Robins RW. Family environment and self-esteem development: a longitudinal study from age 10 to 16, 2020.
Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate Th J, van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature. Medical Teacher. 2011;33(5):e242-e262. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539.
Marjoribanks K. Family environments and children’s outcomes. Educational Psychology. 2005;25(6):647-657. doi:10.1080/01443410500344704.
Modecki KL, Goldberg RE, Wisniewski P, Orben A. What is digital parenting? A systematic review of past measurement and blueprint for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2022;17(6):1673-1691. doi:10.1177/17456916211072458.
Rustina N, Nurdin N, Suharnis, Samsinas, Murniati, Kasmiati, et al. The role of families in narrating Kaili ethnic oral traditions to strengthen religious education at elementary schools: an ethnography from two villages in Indonesia. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 2026;13(1):2610053. doi:10.1080/23311983.2025.2610053.
Seay A, Freysteinson WM, McFarlane J. Positive parenting. Nursing Forum. 2014;49(3):200-208. doi:10.1111/nuf.12093.
Shepherd J. What is the digital era? In: Doukidis G, Mylonopoulos N, Pouloudi N, editors. Social and economic transformation in the digital era. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2004, 1-18.
Susanto TD, Diani MM, Hafidz I. User acceptance of e-government citizen report system (a case study of City113 app). Procedia Computer Science. 2017;124:560-568. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.190.
Tan CY, Xu N, Liang M, Li L. Meta-analysis of associations between digital parenting and children's digital wellbeing. Educational Research Review. 2025;48:100699. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100699.
Walberg HJ, Marjoribanks K. Family environment and cognitive development: twelve analytic models. Review of Educational Research. 1976;46(4):527-551.
Wiersema MF, Bowen HP. The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal. 2009;30(6):679-692. doi:10.1002/smj.758.
