The analysis of India’s trade relations with its neighbors: implications of regional cooperation and development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.5.S1.1-10Keywords:
Multilateral trade, Neighboring countries, Gravity model, Regional trade integration, Panel data analysisAbstract
This study conducts a detailed analysis of India's multilateral trade with its nine neighbors-Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, Maldives, Nepal, China, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka–based on the gravity model of trade. This study adopts a quantitative research approach to analyze India's trade with its neighbors. It evaluates the significance of neighboring economies in India's overall trade structure and their integration with subregional economies. The study is based on key trade variables, including multilateral exports and imports with neighbors, total multilateral trade, the trade balance, and the shares of India's exports, imports, total trade, and the trade balance in total trade. The analysis uses secondary data from official statistics published by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India. Data were collated and pre-processed in Microsoft Excel, and econometric analysis was performed in RStudio. It includes descriptive statistics, correlation diagnostics, and panel data estimation methods based on gravity equations. In particular, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), fixed- and random-effects models were estimated in a pooled framework to investigate the determinants and dynamics of multilateral trade with neighboring countries. The empirical results suggest that bilateral and multilateral export–import relationships between India and its immediate neighbors greatly influence regional trade. The coefficients of exports and imports of neighboring countries are statistically significant across all model specifications, implying that higher multilateral trade flows lead to higher trade flows in the region. The models' explanatory power is high (R² ranges from 0.945 to 0.972), and tests show the superiority of the fixed-effects model. However, India's global export and import levels are statistically insignificant in explaining regional trade flows. In summary, the findings suggest that multilateral trade remains the primary driver of India's regional trade. This study suggests that increased economic integration, structural reforms, and trade connectivity with neighboring nations are needed to promote regional integration and sustainable growth.
References
Baldwin R. The World Trade Organization and the future of multilateralism. J Econ Perspect. 2016;30(1):95-116. doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.95.
Bhagwati J, Lehman A, Panagariya A. The economics of preferential trade agreements. Washington (DC): AEI Press, 1996.
Civil Society Dialogue on Trade Relations with India. EU trade relations with India, 2026.
Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (DGCI&S). A quick view of India’s trade scenario. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, 2025.
Bhattacharya S, Sachdev BK. A study on growing Indian economy in relation to the international foreign trade. World J Adv Res Rev. 2021;12(3):114-118. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2021.12.3.0992.
Hans VB. Multilateralism and India: navigating global challenges through collaborative diplomacy.
Ganesh-Kumar A, Chatterjee T. Mega external preferential trade agreements and their impacts on the Indian economy. Jaipur: CUTS International, 2014.
García AO. International commerce and global change. Transnatl Corp Rev, 2012, 4(3).
Hannah E, Scott J, Wilkinson R. The WTO in Buenos Aires: the outcome and its significance for the future of the multilateral trading system. World Econ. 2018;41(10):2578-2598. doi:10.1111/twec.12657.
Hans VB. Multilateralism and India: navigating global challenges through collaborative diplomacy. Int J Polit Sci Public Adm. 2023;3(2):70-79. doi:10.51483/ijpspa.3.2.2023.70-79.
Hopewell K. Unravelling of the trade legal order: enforcement, defection and the crisis of the WTO dispute settlement system. Int Aff. 2025;101(3):1103-1117. doi:10.1093/ia/iiaf055.
Katti V. Bilateralism vs multilateralism: implications for India. Transnatl Corp Rev, 2012, 4(3).
Malik T. India development update: India’s trade opportunities in a changing global context. Washington (DC): World Bank, 2024.
Mandot AM. WTO and Indian politics. Int J Creat Res Thoughts, 2024, 12(6).
Mattoo A, Subramanian A. India and the multilateral trading system.
Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Press release. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, 2024 Feb 26.
Narlikar A. How not to negotiate: the case of trade multilateralism. Int Aff. 2022;98(5):1553-1573. doi:10.1093/ia/iiac063.
Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Crafted in India, delivered globally: exports powered by trade agreements—key takeaways, 2025.
Rena R. Impact of WTO policies on developing countries: issues and perspectives. Transnatl Corp Rev, 2012, 4(3).
Sauvant KP, Strauss J. State-controlled entities are important outward direct investors. Transnatl Corp Rev, 2012, 4(3).
Singh S. India’s approach towards bilateral, regional and multilateral negotiations. Jaipur: CUTS International, 2015.
United Nations. Trade and development report: rethinking development in the age of discontent. New York: United Nations Publications, 2024.
United Nations. On the brink: trade, finance and the reshaping of the global economy. New York: United Nations Publications, 2025.
Wilkinson R. Changing power relations in the WTO: why the India-US trade agreement should make us worry more, rather than less, about global trade governance. Geoforum. 2015;61:13-16. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.007.
Zhou W. In defense of the WTO: why do we need a multilateral trading system, 2025?
Directorate General of Foreign Trade. Commodity-wise export statistics [Internet]. Available from: https://tradestat.commerce.gov.in/eidb/commodity_wise_export.
