Majoritarian mobocracy, higher education and Vikasit Bharat 2047
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.5.S2.73-78Keywords:
Majoritarian mobocracy, Higher education, Vikasit Bharat 1947Abstract
‘Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely’ (Lord Acton,1877). This dictum makes it mandatory for a democracy to support critical reasoning and scientific temperament to protect it from becoming a majoritarian mobocracy. Cultural majoritarianism across the globe display common tendencies. Identification of a cultural enemy, mostly hatred towards migrants or minority religious groups as a cultural unifying force, setting a narrative and spread the same and curb all other narratives through all possible means to remain in power, and a national cultural pride, claiming to be a world power, super power etc have been at the centre of majoritarian mobocracies in general. German Nazism, Italian fascism and almost everywhere one can easily observe those characteristics. Once in power majoritarain mobocracies tend to convert all institutions of scientific reasoning and critical thinking, including academic institutions to function as cultural propagandists. Academic institutions, specifically higher educational institutions by the production and dissemination of scientific and critical knowledge transforms individuals to become scientific tempered, critical thinkers and to act as public intellectuals by which citizens in particular and nation in general becomes capable of facing future socio-economic challenges. Cultural propagandist education institutions focus on inculcating a national pride of the great past through false narratives which lacks scientific evidences and critical scrutiny. Therefore, any democratic nation that aims to be a developed nation, where citizens enjoy high standards of socio-economic well-being, scientific temperament and critical thinking-based education is the only option. The paper tries to analyze the reports and policy documents of Education commissions and National Education Policies of independent India, to see what extent policy documents incorporate and promote science-based education or retard the educational institutions to function as cultural propagandists. Cultural propagandist institutions are antithetical to socio-economic development of the nation.
References
Aggarwal P. Higher education in India: need for change. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER); 2006. Working Paper No. 180.
Altbach PG, editor. Higher education reform in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1993.
Bhushan S. Commentary. Econ Polit Wkly, 2023, 58(47).
Government of India. Draft National Education Policy 2019 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development, 2019. Available from: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Draft_NEP_2019_EN_Revised.pdf
Bertellini G. Cultural nationalism and democracy’s opinion leaders. In: The divo and the duce. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 2019. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvr7fcgj.7
Anand K, Lall M. Education policy and politics in India and in Delhi. In: Delhi’s education revolution. London: UCL Press, 2022. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2f4v5nz.8
Acton L. Letter to Archbishop Mandell Creighton, 1887 Apr 5 [Internet]. Available from: https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165acton.html
Macaulay TB. Macaulay’s minute on education, 1835 Feb 2 [Internet]. Available from: https://home.iitk.ac.in/~hcverma/Article/Macaulay-Minutes.pdf
Brown NJ, et al. Does authoritarianism make a difference? No, but democracy does. In: Autocrats can’t always get what they want. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press, 2024. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.12761544.9
Government of India. National Education Policy 2020 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development, 2020. Available from: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Government of India. National Policy on Education 1968 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, 1968. Available from: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/document-reports/NPE-1968.pdf
Government of India. National Policy on Education 1986 (as modified in 1992) with National Policy on Education 1968 [Internet]. New Delhi: Department of Education, 1998. Available from: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/document-reports/NPE86-mod92.pdf
Government of India. Preamble: Constitution of India [Internet]. New Delhi: Government of India, 1949. Available from: https://dsel.education.gov.in/sites/default/files/Preamble-English.pdf
Government of India. Report of the Education Commission 1964–66: education and national development [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, 1966. Available from: https://ia801307.us.archive.org/16/items/ReportOfTheEducationCommission1964-66D.S.KothariReport/48.Jp-ReportOfTheEducationCommission1964-66d.s.kothari.pdf
Government of India. Report of the National Committee on Women’s Education [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, 1959. Available from: https://dspace.unitywomenscollege.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/556/Report%20of%20the%20National%20Committee%20on%20Women%27s%20Education%20%28%20May%201958%20to%20January%201959%29.pdf
Government of India. Report of the Secondary Education Commission (Mudaliyar Commission Report) [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, 1953. Available from: https://www.educationforallinindia.com/1953%20Secondary_Education_Commission_Report.pdf
Government of India. Report of the University Education Commission. Vol. 1 [Internet]. Simla: Government of India Press, 1962. Available from: https://www.educationforallinindia.com/1949%20Report%20of%20the%20University%20Education%20Commission.pdf.
