ESG reporting and sustainable development: A study of top 10 Indian companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.5.S2.43-50Keywords:
ESG reporting, BRSR, CRISIL ESG ratings, Carbon intensity, Governance pillar, Sectoral analysis, Viksit Bharat 2047, Sustainable development, Secondary data, Corporate accountabilityAbstract
Companies across the world are now expected to be accountable not just for their profits, but also for how they manage their environmental impact, how they treat their people, and how transparent their governance is. This is what ESG Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting is about. In India, this became a formal regulatory requirement when SEBI introduced the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework in May 2021, making it mandatory from FY 2022-23 for the top 1,000 listed companies.
Analyzed the ESG performance of India's ten most valued companies by market capitalization – Infosys, TCS, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, SBI, Bajaj Finance, HUL, Bharti Airtel, Reliance Industries, and LIC – using CRISIL ESG ratings for FY 2024-25. The scores ranged from 76 (Infosys) to 53 (LIC), a gap of 23 points. Among sectors, Digital/IT companies averaged 75.0, Financial Services averaged 65.2, Manufacturing and Telecom averaged 60.5, and the Energy sector stood at 55.0. When the data was examined, the Governance score was the highest of the three pillars for all seven companies pillar-level data was available.
Evaluated that the sector of which a company belongs to is especially how carbon-intensive its business is, that plays a major role in determining its ESG score. IT firms score high partly because of the nature of their business, not just because they manage sustainability better. The Governance pillar emerged as the strongest pillar consistently, which ties directly to India's BRSR framework where governance disclosures are the most standardized and most verifiable. These findings are placed in the context of India's Viksit Bharat 2047 vision and the Panchamrit climate commitments made at COP26.
References
Arellano LFV. Reframing the firm as a governance system: a critical synthesis of transaction costs, capital structure, and agency theory. Theor Econ Lett. 2025;15(5):1148–61. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2025.155063
Buchetti B, Arduino FR, Perdichizzi S. A literature review on corporate governance and ESG research: emerging trends and future directions. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2025;97:103759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103759
Chakrabarti R, Bharat A, Dash S, Gupta A. Does ESG reporting matter for shareholder value? Evidence on mandatory ESG regulations in India. J Bus Finance Account. 2025. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70005
Chopra SS, Senadheera SS, Dissanayake PD, Withana PA, Chib R, Rhee JH, et al. Navigating the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: the path to broader sustainable development. Sustainability. 2024;16(2):606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606
CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited. ESG ratings list (FY 2024–25) [Internet]. Mumbai: CRISIL; 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.crisilesg.com/en/home/esg-ratings.html
Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Manage Sci. 2014;60(11):2835–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Freeman RE. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. London: Pitman; 1984.
Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J Sustain Finance Invest. 2015;5(4):210–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ. 1976;3(4):305–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Motwani A, Gupta R. ESG reporting: environmental dimension disclosures by large energy sector companies in India. Eur J Theor Appl Sci. 2023;1(2):108–18. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(2).11
Securities and Exchange Board of India. Business responsibility and sustainability reporting by listed entities. Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD-2/P/CIR/2021/562. New Delhi: SEBI; 2021 May 10. Available from: https://www.sebi.gov.in
Securities and Exchange Board of India. BRSR Core framework for assurance and ESG disclosures. Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-SEC-2/P/CIR/2023/122. New Delhi: SEBI; 2023 Jul 12. Available from: https://www.sebi.gov.in
Senadheera SS, Withana PA, Dissanayake PD, Sarkar B, Chopra SS, Rhee JH, et al. Scoring environment pillar in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assessment. Sustain Environ. 2021;7(1):1960097. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1960097
Sharma P, Panday P, Dangwal RC. Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies. Int J Disclos Gov. 2020;17(4):208–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00085-y
Tickertape. Largest companies by market cap — India [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.tickertape.in/stocks/collections/largest-companies-by-market-cap
Valliammal M, Manivannan SK. Corporate governance and ESG performance in Indian power sector. Eur Econ Lett. 2023;13(5):1255–62. https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v13i5.903
Yadav G, Luthra S, Jakhar SK, Mangla SK, Rai DP. Exploring the nexus between Industry 5.0 and ESG reporting for sustainable development goals. Sustain Dev. 2025. Epub ahead of print.
