Can the world be a family in an age of power Politics? Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and the future of multipolar geopolitics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.5.S1.215-220Keywords:
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, Global international relations, Indian knowledge systems, Multipolar world order, Normative geopolitics, Post-western IR theoryAbstract
The contemporary international system is marked by intensifying great-power rivalry, strategic fragmentation, and the reassertion of hard power politics, even as global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, forced migration, and technological disruption demand cooperative responses. In this context, the question of whether the world can be imagined as a moral community rather than merely a competitive arena of states acquires renewed significance. This paper interrogates the relevance of the Indian civilizational concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, the idea that “the world is one family”, for rethinking geopolitics in an emerging multipolar order.
Drawing upon Indian Knowledge Systems, particularly the ethical and relational worldview articulated in the Maha Upanishad, the study situates Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam as a normative framework that challenges the dominance of realist assumptions in International Relations. Unlike liberal universalism or Western cosmopolitanism, this concept emphasizes relational ethics, mutual responsibility, and coexistence amidst diversity, offering an alternative moral imagination of global order. The paper engages with Global International Relations (Global IR) and post-Western theoretical debates to argue that non-Western Knowledge traditions can contribute meaningfully to the reconstitution of international theory and practice.
The analysis compares Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam with the ideas of power politics, the balance of power, and strategic competition that are part of today’s multipolarity in Global International Relations. This comparison is important for Global International Relations. The paper looks at how India uses the idea of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam in talks with countries and in international meetings. This idea is about treating the world like one family. India brings up this idea when discussing issues of helping people in need and working with other countries in the same region. It contributes to ongoing debates on normative geopolitics by demonstrating how Indian Knowledge Systems can inform a more plural, inclusive, and ethically grounded understanding of world politics. Ultimately, the study suggests that in an age of multipolarity and persistent conflict, reimagining the world as a moral community is not merely aspirational but increasingly necessary for the sustainability of global order. Through a conceptual and interpretive methodology, the paper examines how India has invoked this civilizational ethic in diplomatic discourse and multilateral engagements, particularly in the context of global governance, humanitarian assistance, and South-South cooperation. It contributes to ongoing debates on normative geopolitics by demonstrating how Indian Knowledge Systems can inform a more plural, inclusive, and ethically grounded understanding of world politics. Ultimately, the study suggests that in an age of multipolarityand persistent conflict, reimagining the world as a moral community is not merely aspirational but increasingly necessary for the sustainability of global order.
References
Acharya R. Ethics and world order: Rethinking global responsibility in the 21st century. New Delhi: Naman Press, 2022.
Bajpai K, Pant HV, editors. India’s foreign policy: Emerging global trends. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Bhatia S. Multipolarity and the future of global governance. Journal of Strategic Affairs. 2020;14(2):113-129.
Bilgin P. The international in security, security in the international. London: Routledge; 2016.
Bull H. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002.
Chakravarti A. Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam as a diplomatic framework. Indian Review of Global Studies. 2023;8(1):45-62.
Chaturvedi S, Doyle T. Climate terror: Critical geopolitics of climate change. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
Gallagher KP. The rise of the Global South and the future of global governance. Washington (DC): Brookings Institution Press; 2022.
Ganguly S, Pardesi MS. India’s rise and the promise of multipolarity. Foreign Affairs. 2023;102(4):103-116.
Hurrell A. Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs. 2006;82(1):1-19.
D’Souza M. Global public goods and moral responsibility. International Policy Quarterly. 2019;12(4):201-224.
Kaldor M. Human security: Reflections on globalization and intervention. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.
Kumar R. India’s civilizational diplomacy and the ethics of global interdependence. Journal of Asian Studies. 2021;80(4):1121-1140.
Kumar P. Normative power and India’s foreign policy identity. South Asian Politics Review. 2021;19(3):51-73.
Mahbubani K. Has China won? The Chinese challenge to American primacy. New York: PublicAffairs; 2020.
Mohan CR. Modi’s world: Expanding India’s sphere of influence. New Delhi: HarperCollins; 2023.
Nair V, Shenoy R. Human security in a fragmented world: A Global South perspective. Journal of Human Development Studies. 2023;7(1):89-104.
Pant HV, Krishnappa V. India’s rise and the balancing of power in Asia. Orbis. 2012;56(3):401-416.
Raman Y. The geopolitics of interdependence: Crisis, conflict, and cooperation. Global Studies Review. 2022;17(2):31-47.
Sen K. Civilizational diplomacy and the ethics of multipolarity. International Relations Perspectives. 2020;9(3):77-94.
Singh MP. India’s pluralistic civilizational identity and global governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2018;47(1):78-99.
Sharma R. Understanding Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam in contemporary Indian diplomacy. International Studies. 2023;60(2):145-162.
Sharma L. Rethinking cosmopolitanism in an age of rivalry. Contemporary World Affairs. 2023;11(2):120-139.
Verma R. India’s soft power in the 21st century: Norms, narratives, and diplomacy. New Delhi: Sahitya Policy Press; 2021.
United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 1994: New dimensions of human security. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1979.
Zakaria F. The post-American world. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton; 2011.
